Rep. Tom Gann: Warrantless License Plate Scanner Tracking Is Not Authorized By State Law

Below is a press Release from Oklahoma Representative Tom Gann’s office. The press release was being censored in the house and was refuse the use of the State Representative Press Release System without serious being done to it.

“State Representative Tom Gann issued a statement today following the dramatic defeat of SB 1620 on Thursday.

“In 2016, the legislature made the unfortunate decision to authorize the use of license plate scanner technology for the purpose of insurance verification. That law limited the use of this intrusive technology to that purpose only. This year, the legislature considered House Bill 3570, which was not heard prior to the 3rd reading deadline, and Senate Bill 1620, which was defeated on Thursday by a wide margin — becoming one of the very few bills to be defeated on the Senate floor. These bills would have authorized the use of this technology for purposes other than insurance verification. As these laws have failed, it’s important for the public and city councils across the state to know that: There is no specific statutory authorization for using these systems.”

While the legislature was considering these proposals, Gann says that numerous concerning details have been brought forward.

While the advocates of this data advocate for its ability to automate NCIC and Amber alert scanning, it’s clear that the real impact of this technology is to create a database of vehicles’ travels, complete with the vehicles’ identifiers, including its bumper stickers, and to then allow warrantless searches of that data, data that’s stored in the cloud and that is then subsequently shared with many, many diverse government entities including those that are not in Oklahoma.

To demonstrate this concern, Gann pointed to the fact that in the past 30 days, Tulsa’s data collection has been queried 2,143 times compared to 1,364 Amber and NCIC alerts.

“That’s 2,143 searches that have clearly occurred without a warrant and undoubtedly compromised the information of many innocent persons,” Gann states.

Gann also states that departments who use this technology have been known to share access to the data collection with federal agencies, including the FBI and ATF.

“No Oklahoman should ever have to worry about their movements being shared with the Biden Administration’s federal police state,” Gann declared. “That’s clearly what this technology is enabling.”

In the case of the Del City Police Department, that Department appears to be sharing their information with more than 60 other government entities including the US Postal Service, the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, and the Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center.

In addition to sharing Oklahomans’ travel data with many government entities, the technology also appears to allow government entities to create custom hit lists that will inform them whenever certain people attempt to travel into or within their city limits.

“In my view, these abuses are clear violations of the 4th Amendment, and are not specifically authorized by state law. By defeating SB 1620 by such a wide margin, the Legislature has clearly signaled that it doesn’t intend to authorize them at any point in the near future.”

Tulsa: https://archive.is/SMyNY
Del City: https://archive.is/Jcq7e

THE POWER IS DERIVED FROM GOD TO YOU


In the Bible going back to Genesis, God gave dominion and stewardship to individual man. From that time to this day, governments and certain individuals have come along to centralize or take that responsibility from the individual man and woman. As the book of Romans says, “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”

We The People can position ourselves to take back the dominion which our Creator bestowed to us. The tool that can accomplish that begins at the precinct level, all the way to the state level in your political party.

Many of you may recall Senator James Lankford joining national Democrats in a deal to basically open our borders up to just anyone. A State Committee of the Oklahoma Republican Party was held in OKC on Saturday, January 27th. A regular cowboy from the Panhandle, along with others, drafted and passed a resolution Censuring and Condemning James Lankford on compromising your Liberty and security. Unknown to us, the national media would run with, and it forced James Lankford to immediately go on national shows like Fox News (among others) to do a very poor and embarrassing political spin attempt to cover his shameful actions. Glenn Beck, as well as others across the nation, ran stories and read the resolution on air. In the last several days this resolution — passed by every day business owners, farmers and cowboys at the Oklahoma Republican Party reclaiming their authority — spurred an awareness to people across the country that they too can reclaim their God given authority from tyrants in government.

You The PEOPLE can start taking back your authority, starting in your local party.
Who knows, you may even have a little fun along the way, nationally embarrassing out – of – touch tools like James Lankford, while stopping damaging actions in their tracks. Keep an eye on upcoming dates for your Republican Precinct and County conventions.
Take back your dominion and do it by using the tool of getting involved with your local Republican Party.

Governor Stitt’s Executive Order To Target Liberty and Free Speech?

On November 1st Governor Kevin Stitt issued Executive Order 2023-29, creating the Campaign Finance and Election Threats Task Force to supposedly rigorously assess campaign finance, scrutinize foreign investment, and combat foreign interference in Oklahoma elections.

It is interesting the language the governor uses, mirrors leftist talking points regarding foreign interference etc. and is absolutely void in addressing the issue of machines that can be hacked and manipulated.
Additionally the named members the Governor says will be on this task force have made lite of or refuse to acknowledge issues such as ballot or machine manipulation.

One particular alarm I believe is found in #3 on the Governor’s order. “3. Design, for the Legislature’s benefit as it considers drafting common-sense legislation to curtail any interference in our politics, a mechanism or process by which the state can detect the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation against the peace and dignity of the State of Oklahoma.” This language is extremely alarming in Police State terms. What would be considered “propaganda and disinformation” or “interference in our politics”? This is the very thing that leftists with the Deep State have accused the American People and whistle blowers of, particularly around the 2020 election debate.

You decide if Governor Stitt is setting Oklahomans up to have their free speech and Liberty targeted or have you, a Police State.

My email I sent to Governor Kevin Stitt at generalcounsel@gov.ok.gov

Dear Governor,

I was going through Executive Order 2023-29 last night and came across something very alarming. On #3 it states: “Design, for the Legislature’s benefit as it considers drafting common-sense legislation to curtail any interference in our politics, a mechanism or process by which the state can detect the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation against the peace and dignity of the State of Oklahoma.“

As a blogger I’ve been accused of propaganda by people on higher political levels in Oklahoma. Who or what would determine what is “interference in our politics” or “distribution of propaganda and disinformation against the peace and dignity of the State of Oklahoma” is?

This is very concerning and troubling and screams Police State. Our public servants in a state like Oklahoma should be invested in fighting and protecting the rights of the people, not pushing for restrictions or shadow restrictions or regulations of those rights.

Thank you for your time and for your timely reply.

For Life and Liberty,
Kenny Bob Tapp
Phone: (580)-516-1907

To read the full executive order, go here: https://oklahoma.gov/governor/newsroom/newsroom/2023/november2023/governor-stitt-creates-campaign-finance-and-election-threats-tas.html

Cattle Group Addresses mRNA Concerns; Concludes MCOOL for Beef Is Needed ASAP

  R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America“Fighting for the Independent U.S. Cattle Producer”For Immediate ReleaseBy: R-CALF USA Field Director Karina JonesContact: R-CALF USA CEO Bill BullardPhone: 406-252-2516; r-calfusa@r-calfusa.comView and share this news release on Facebook here or view the web version here.Cattle Group Addresses mRNA Concerns; Concludes MCOOL for Beef Is Needed ASAPBILLINGS, Mont., April 20, 2023 – On Monday, following a meeting he had with medical doctors and a molecular biologist, R-CALF USA Animal Health Committee Chair, Max Thornsberry, DVM, briefed the R-CALF USA board on the status of mRNA injections in the global protein supply chain. Thornsberry reported that some researchers have found that mRNA and its coded virus is likely passed from an injected human to a noninjected human, and to humans who have consumed dairy products or meat from an mRNA-injected animal. He said that because the research on mRNA is still in its infancy, no one really knows the full impact it has on either humans or animals, particularly its long-term impact. He said this itself warrants more extensive mRNA research focused on safety, heightened public vigilance, and greater transparency. Thornsberry pointed out that the United States has not approved mRNA injections in cattle, but they are in use on a limited basis in swine. He said the dilemma for beef is that the U.S. is importing more and more beef from many different countries, some of which either already are or plan to begin using mRNA in cattle for such cattle diseases as foot-and-mouth disease and lumpy skin disease.   “This points to the urgent need for MCOOL (mandatory country of origin labeling),” he said adding, “Consumers deserve the right to choose whether to consume beef from a country where mRNA injections are being given to cattle, and the only way they can have that choice is if Congress passes MCOOL for beef.”     Due to the information presented by Thornsberry, the R-CALF USA board passed a motion to bring this issue before the R-CALF USA membership at its next annual meeting to determine policy direction for the organization.Until that policy is fully developed, R-CALF USA strongly reinforces the need for mandatory country of origin labeling (the American Beef Labeling Act, S. 52) on beef immediately. R-CALF USA President Brett Kenzy said, “Without an MCOOL label on our beef, the American consumer has no way of knowing if the beef they are buying is coming from a country using this debatable mRNA technology in their cattle health management.”Kenzy pointed out that as new information is becoming public about the use of the controversial mRNA vaccine technology in cattle health protocols in foreign countries, at the same time beef imports have been increasing while the United States cattle inventory continues to contract, surpassing 60-year inventory lows. He said the result is that our domestic beef demand is fast becoming more dependent on the global beef supply chain, which makes enactment of MCOOL all the more urgent.# # #Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF USA) is the largest producer-only lobbying and trade association representing U.S. cattle producers. It is a national, nonprofit organization dedicated to ensuring the continued profitability and viability of the U.S. cattle industry. Visit www.r-calfusa.com or call (406) 252-2516 for more information.R-CALF USA | PO Box 30715, Billings, MT 59107  www.r-calfusa.com | r-calfusa@r-calfusa.com  Phone 406-252-2516 | Fax 406-252-3176       
R-CALF USAPO Box 30715Billings, MT 59107

OK Supreme Court’s Roe-like Ruling

 By John Michener

OKFORLIFE MARCH 25, 2023 ABOLITION ABORTION PRO-LIFE

On 21 March 2023 the Supreme Court of the State Of Oklahoma (the Court) held in a 5-4 decision that Oklahoma’s most recent abortion law (63 O.S. § 1-731.4, passed as SB 612) “is void and unenforceable.”  The criminality of abortion in Oklahoma is now governed primarily by two older statutes which had been superseded by the Court-voided one.

The first statute is 21 O.S. § 21-861, which reads:  “Every person who administers to any woman, or who prescribes for any woman, or advises or procures any woman to take any medicine, drug or substance, or uses or employs any instrument, or other means whatever, with intent thereby to procure the miscarriage of such woman, unless the same is necessary to preserve her life, shall be guilty of a felony….”

The second statute is 63 O.S. § 63-1-733, which reads:  “No woman shall perform or induce an abortion upon herself, except under the supervision of a duly licensed physician.”

These two statutes together sound like they would criminalize all elective abortions, and they would if enforced and adjudicated by normal citizens in the ways they were obviously intended when originally written and enacted.  Unfortunately, the Court also took the opportunity of this opinion to codify new woke interpretations of the Oklahoma Constitution and statutes, intending to dramatically broaden and permit murder by abortion.

First, in a very twisted trick of interpretation, the Court has supposedly found a right to abortion in Article 2 Section 2 of the Oklahoma Constitution which provides:  “All persons have the inherent right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the enjoyment of the gains of their own industry.”

Note this crazy analysis of the Court:  “We hold that the Oklahoma Constitution [Article 2 Section 2] creates an inherent right of a pregnant woman to terminate a pregnancy when necessary to preserve her life.”  Justice Combs later explains that the constitutional right to life and liberty “would include a right to privacy and personal autonomy.”  And of course they view abortion as a private and personal matter.

Furthermore, they have also reinterpreted the phrase “preserve her life” to no longer mean save her life in a medical emergency.  Note the strained and contrived way in which they arbitrarily define preserve her life:  “We would define this inherent right to mean:  a woman has an inherent right to choose to terminate her pregnancy if at any point in the pregnancy, the woman’s physician has determined to a reasonable degree of medical certainty or probability that the continuation of the pregnancy will endanger the woman’s life due to the pregnancy itself or due to a medical condition that the woman is either currently suffering from or likely to suffer from during the pregnancy.  Absolute certainty is not required….”

With this opinion the Court has foretold to the world how they will adjudicate abortion cases in Oklahoma.  Remember the doctor’s note in high school that was a free pass for tardiness and absence?  A women now needs no more than a doctor’s note that she is acting to “preserve her life” to literally get away with murder.  The court will throw out any case against her or her doctor.  This opinion was clearly designed to open the bloody floodgates in Oklahoma. 

Back Row: Justices Dustin P. Rowe, Douglas L. Combs, Noma Gurich, and Dana Kuehn Front Row: Justices James R. Winchester, M. John Kane IV, Richard Darby, Yvonne Kauger, and James E. Edmondson

Chief Justice Kane in his well-written dissent said that “the majority engages in legal contortions…by fashioning Oklahoma Constitutional precepts of abortion law that simply do not exist.  There is no expressed or implied right to abortion enshrined in the Oklahoma Constitution.  In interpreting our Constitution, this Court must guard against the innate human temptation to confuse what is provided in the Oklahoma Constitution with what one wishes were provided.”

At this juncture it might be pointless to petition for further legislation, no matter how principled.  Justices Kauger, Winchester, Edmondson, Combs, and Gurich have acted outrageously and will continue to do so.  This merry-go-round will not stop until these tyrannical bullies are thrown off their playground thrones.  We should ask Governor Stitt, Attorney General Drummond, and our State Representatives to put the Court in its place, to impeach these rogue judges.

Geo-Fencing Coming Soon?

By Kenny Bob Tapp

If you’ve been on the outskirts of Boise City, Oklahoma recently you may have seen a white camper trailer with cameras and other devices attached. The trailer had the Oklahoma Highway Patrol logo on the side. I saw it on Highway 56 for a couple days and then saw it on South Highway 287.
The camper trailer is part of a test program by ODOT to detect how many trucks travel on our highways to see if perhaps a geo-fence could be placed around Boise City. Supposedly if a geo-fence were in place it could detect semi load weights and allow some freight traffic the luxury to avoid turning off to the Port of Entry for inspection.

What is Geo-Fencing?

From https://www.verizonconnect.com/glossary/what-is-a-geofence/

“A geofence is a virtual fence or perimeter around a physical location. Like a real fence, a geofence creates a separation between that location and the area around it. Unlike a real fence, it can also detect movement inside the virtual boundary.

It can be any size or shape, even a straight line between two points.

Geofences are created using mapping software, which allow the user to draw the geofence over the desired geographic area. It is made up of a collection of coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) or in the case of a circular geofence one point that forms the center.

Geofence use cases

When integrated with fleet management and telematics solutions, geofences can be used to alert you via text message in near real time if a vehicle or valuable piece of equipment with a GPS tracker attached is removed from your yard without your authorization. Or it could notify you if a drone enters a restricted airspace.”

While geo-fencing may serve as a convenience for freight companies, livestock haulers, etc., we must ask at what price? Though this technology may have its conveniences it could eventually be used for tracking and movement of everyone. We are definitely moving further into the time of Big Brother, A Brave New World.

Your inalienable rights enshrined in the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that protect your right to privacy and to be secure in your persons and papers are basically a thing of the past. May we be ever vigilant.

Oklahoma’s Pro-Abortion Bill (SB 834)

The Oklahoma Senate Health and Human Services Committee passed SB 834 by (r)epublican, Senator Julie Daniels last week: http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=Sb834&Session=2300

SB 834 protects abortion in four ways:

Sen. Julie Daniels

  1. 1. Place exceptions into Oklahoma’s abortion law that would allow for the murder of children conceived in rape and incest.
  1. 2. Legalize self-managed abortion in Oklahoma by repealing Oklahoma Statute §63-1-73.
  2. 3. Protect abortifacient drugs.
  3. 4. Protect any “act related to in vitro fertilization,” which includes the act of discarding “low-grade embryos.”

With the Repeal of Roe V Wade last summer one would assume Oklahoma legislators would keep their pledge and abolish abortion. On the contrary, the legislature has refused to take up SB 402 by Senator Warren Hamilton which would do just that, criminalize abortion as murder. Instead the State Senate is poised to pass SB 834 which fully reinstates surgical abortions that butcher children to death with forceps and scalpels.

Please email the Oklahoma State Senators using the Senate email addresses below with your thoughts:

jerry.alvord@oksenate.gov, micheal.bergstrom@oksenate.gov,  david.bullard@oksenate.gov, george.burns@oksenate.gov, bill.coleman@oksenate.gov, nathan.dahm@oksenate.gov, julie.daniels@oksenate.gov, tom.dugger@oksenate.gov, jessica.garvin@oksenate.gov, todd.gollihare@oksenate.gov, grant.green@oksenate.gov, chuck.hall@oksenate.gov, warren.hamilton@oksenate.gov, john.haste@oksenate.gov, brent.howard@oksenate.gov, darcy.jech@oksenate.gov, shane.jett@oksenate.gov, chris.kidd@oksenate.gov, greg.mccortney@oksenate.gov, john.montgomery@oksenate.gov, casey.murdock@oksenate.gov, joe.newhouse@oksenate.gov, lonnie.paxton@oksenate.gov, roland.pederson@oksenate.gov, dewayne.pemberton@oksenate.gov, dana.prieto@oksenate.gov, adam.pugh@oksenate.gov, dave.rader@oksenate.gov, cody.rogers@oksenate.gov, paul.rosino@oksenate.gov, ally.seifried@oksenate.gov, rob.standridge@oksenate.gov, brenda.stanley@oksenate.gov, blake.stephens@oksenate.gov, jack.stewart@oksenate.gov, kristen.thompson@oksenate.gov, roger.thompson@oksenate.gov, greg.treat@oksenate.gov, darrell.weaver@oksenate.gov, tom.woods@oksenate.gov

Died Suddenly Premier

Please click on the link to watch the Died Suddenly Premiere by the Stew Peters Network:

“Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world – even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them.

The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.
They are the minds behind WATCH THE WATER and THESE LITTLE ONES, and now have a damning presentation on the truth about the greatest ongoing mass genocide in human history.” – Stew Peters Network

Horowitz: Oklahoma Gov. Stitt touts Agenda 2030 green energy as ‘where investments are headed’

DANIEL HOROWITZ

September 15, 2022


If Democrats are akin to voracious wolves seeking to turn the American sheep into a carcass, the Republicans are the vultures seeking to cash in by feasting on that carcass rather than calling in the lions to battle the wolves and protect the American sheep. Nowhere is this more evident than with Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signing on to the green energy “Agenda 2030” plan to replace cars with electric vehicles in supposedly conservative Oklahoma. Except, unlike most other Republicans, he should get points for honesty, providing us with a full understanding of why Republicans will never fight for us on an issue that matters. The reason? The money and “investments” are always on the side of tyranny. 

It should now be abundantly obvious to any thinking person that the weather tyranny and green energy agenda aren’t just cute or even annoying; they will quite literally kill millions of people with starvation and lack of access to vital goods and services. They are coming for our food and fuel the same way they came for ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the pandemic. Thus, any promotion of green energy, with its officious regime of government mandates and subsidies, will necessarily ease the death of energy that actually works. So we are all on the same page as conservatives that green energy must be shunned, right?

Read more at: https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-oklahoma-stitt-touts-green-agenda